GDP Contribution by Sector in Severozápad – Share of gross value added

A comprehensive visualization of GDP contribution by sector in the Severozápad (CZ04) region, following the same format as the one for Upper Austria with both a pie chart and a horizontal bar chart.

The visualization shows:

1. Sectoral breakdown by percentage and value:
   • Manufacturing: 32.6% (132,854 million CZK)
   • Wholesale & Retail Trade, Transport: 15.3% (62,185 million CZK)
   • Public Administration, Education, Health: 14.2% (57,643 million CZK)
   • Mining & Quarrying: 10.1% (41,268 million CZK)
   • Real Estate Activities: 8.8% (35,842 million CZK)
   • Construction: 6.5% (26,487 million CZK)
   • Professional & Technical Activities: 5.6% (22,769 million CZK)
   • Electricity, Gas, Water Supply: 3.7% (15,073 million CZK)
   • Information & Communication: 2.0% (8,162 million CZK)
   • Agriculture, Forestry & Fishing: 0.9% (3,669 million CZK)
   • Other Services: 0.3% (1,225 million CZK)
2. A detailed data table with NACE codes, absolute values, and percentage shares for each sector
3. Key insights highlighting Severozápad’s economic profile:
   • Heavy reliance on manufacturing (32.6%) similar to Upper Austria but with an additional significant mining sector (10.1%)
   • Service sectors collectively contribute around 46%, less than the Czech national average
   • Very small contributions from agriculture (0.9%) and newer sectors like Information & Communication (2.0%)

When comparing with Upper Austria, several differences and similarities stand out:

• Similarities:
  • Both regions have a strong manufacturing base (30-33% of GVA)
  • Agriculture plays a minor role in both economies despite rural areas
  • Real estate activities contribute similar shares (8-9%)
• Key differences:
  • Severozápad has significant mining activity (10.1%) not present in Upper Austria
  • Upper Austria has a stronger services sector overall
  • Severozápad has less development in information/communication and professional services
  • Severozápad’s economic structure creates more vulnerability to sectoral downturns